Melanie Judge?s piece was published in the?Mail & Guardian, a leading African paper, under the title, ?Hi, Cardinal Napier. I?m lesbian.? She begins by questioning the cardinal?s involvement on issues of sexuality if he knows of no LGBT individuals:
?For someone who doesn?t know any homosexuals, you?ve spent a considerable amount of time concerning yourself with the lives of lesbian and gay people ? specifically our rights to equality and protection under the law.
?If you don?t know us, and then by implication there aren?t any of us in your church, it seems queer that you would assume such an active position in denying us our right to rights.?
Ms. Judge is not content to say that Napier is simply anti-gay. ? Instead, she believes his staunch opposition to South African legislation that would legalize civil unions is merely an attempt to preserve his power, and the power of the Catholic Church, that
??entrenches a version of social relations and human sexuality based on male supremacy, the subordination of women, and the abjection of homosexuality?.Perhaps your investment in the lives of sinful others is driven by an interest in protecting that power and the ideology that props it up. If so, I can understand why you?d rail against gays, lesbians and women who challenge your ideology.?
She continues by shedding light on Napier?s attempt to make LGBT people invisible, which contradicts the Church?s call to acknowledge, welcome, and include LGBT people:
?As you would know, a powerful way to neutralise nonconforming people whose very existence challenges your church?s prescription for human interaction is to make them invisible. To deny the very existence of gay and lesbian people is to render them unknowable and unseeable. Excluding people in this way sends a message to lesbian and gay people in your church (many of whom I know and see, and I?m not even Catholic) that they will be not be acknowledged by your leadership. To deny recognition is to deny human dignity, a strategy at the heart of homophobia.?
Ms. Judge?s comments examine the desperate attempts by Catholic bishops to maintain their privilege in a society structured around heterosexual relationships and male dominance, adding the unique perspective of a South African to her critique of oppression:
?Sexuality and gender were heavily regulated and constrained under apartheid and colonialism. Women and queers ?knew their place? and ?suffered? quietly and invisibly. Now we see a burgeoning of sexual and gender diversity ? it?s exciting stuff, Cardinal. It?s a sign of a plural and democratising society in which ?difference is no longer synonymous with dysfunction.
?Shunning difference and enforcing conformity is how the church has asserted its control over populations for centuries. But this unchecked grip on power has been slipping in the face of democratic pressures. I feel for you, Cardinal; it?s hard to compete with the divine prospect of freedom and equality?
?Queers and women are laying claim to the resources, recognition and representations of citizenship ? both inside and outside the church. It?s the stuff of democracy and of human rights. Still, none so blind as those who will not see.?
Melanie Judge respectfully confronts Cardinal Napier for both the ignorance his statement contains and the the underlying causes driving his anti-LGBT efforts.
?Bob Shine, New Ways Ministry
Like this:
Loading...
jarhead montrose marshawn lynch earthquake bay area deron williams clear channel drexel
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.